[Mar 07, 2024] Achive your Success with Latest EC-COUNCIL 312-50v11 Exam [Q26-Q42]

Share

Achive your Success with Latest EC-COUNCIL 312-50v11 Exam [Mar 07, 2024]

The 312-50v11 Exam Test For Brief Preparation 


EC-COUNCIL 312-50v11 Certified Ethical Hacker Exam (CEH v11) is one of the most widely recognized and respected certifications in the field of cybersecurity. It is designed to test the skills and knowledge of professionals who are seeking to become ethical hackers or cybersecurity experts. 312-50v11 exam is based on the latest industry standards and best practices, ensuring that candidates are equipped with the most up-to-date knowledge and skills.

 

NEW QUESTION # 26
What would be the purpose of running "wget 192.168.0.15 -q -S" against a web server?

  • A. Using wget to perform banner grabbing on the webserver
  • B. Flooding the web server with requests to perform a DoS attack
  • C. Downloading all the contents of the web page locally for further examination
  • D. Performing content enumeration on the web server to discover hidden folders

Answer: A

Explanation:
-q, --quiet quiet (no output)
-S, --server-response print server response


NEW QUESTION # 27
What would be the purpose of running "wget 192.168.0.15 -q -S" against a web server?

  • A. Using wget to perform banner grabbing on the webserver
  • B. Flooding the web server with requests to perform a DoS attack
  • C. Downloading all the contents of the web page locally for further examination
  • D. Performing content enumeration on the web server to discover hidden folders

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 28
Eve is spending her day scanning the library computers. She notices that Alice is using a computer whose port
445 is active and listening. Eve uses the ENUM tool to enumerate Alice machine. From the command prompt, she types the following command.

What is Eve trying to do?

  • A. Eve is trying to enumerate all users with Administrative privileges
  • B. Eve is trying to escalate privilege of the null user to that of Administrator
  • C. Eve is trying to connect as a user with Administrator privileges
  • D. Eve is trying to carry out a password crack for user Administrator

Answer: D


NEW QUESTION # 29
Joel, a professional hacker, targeted a company and identified the types of websites frequently visited by its employees. Using this information, he searched for possible loopholes in these websites and injected a malicious script that can redirect users from the web page and download malware onto a victim's machine. Joel waits for the victim to access the infected web application so as to compromise the victim's machine. Which of the following techniques is used by Joel in the above scenario?

  • A. Clickjacking attack
  • B. Watering hole attack
  • C. MarioNet attack
  • D. DNS rebinding attack

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 30
You are a penetration tester tasked with testing the wireless network of your client Brakeme SA.
You are attempting to break into the wireless network with the SSID "Brakeme-lnternal." You realize that this network uses WPA3 encryption, which of the following vulnerabilities is the promising to exploit?

  • A. Cross-site request forgery
  • B. Key reinstallation attack
  • C. AP Myconfiguration
  • D. Dragonblood

Answer: D

Explanation:
Dragonblood allows an attacker in range of a password-protected Wi-Fi network to get the password and gain access to sensitive information like user credentials, emails and mastercard numbers. consistent with the published report: "The WPA3 certification aims to secure Wi-Fi networks, and provides several advantages over its predecessor WPA2, like protection against offline dictionary attacks and forward secrecy. Unfortunately, we show that WPA3 is suffering from several design flaws, and analyze these flaws both theoretically and practically. Most prominently, we show that WPA3's Simultaneous Authentication of Equals (SAE) handshake, commonly referred to as Dragonfly, is suffering from password partitioning attacks." Our Wi-Fi researchers at WatchGuard are educating businesses globally that WPA3 alone won't stop the Wi-Fi hacks that allow attackers to steal information over the air (learn more in our recent blog post on the topic). These Dragonblood vulnerabilities impact alittle amount of devices that were released with WPA3 support, and makers are currently making patches available. one among the most important takeaways for businesses of all sizes is to know that a long-term fix might not be technically feasible for devices with lightweight processing capabilities like IoT and embedded systems. Businesses got to consider adding products that enable a Trusted Wireless Environment for all kinds of devices and users alike. Recognizing that vulnerabilities like KRACK and Dragonblood require attackers to initiate these attacks by bringing an "Evil Twin" Access Point or a Rogue Access Point into a Wi-Fi environment, we've been that specialize in developing Wi-Fi security solutions that neutralize these threats in order that these attacks can never occur. The Trusted Wireless Environment framework protects against the "Evil Twin" Access Point and Rogue Access Point. one among these hacks is required to initiate the 2 downgrade or side-channel attacks referenced in Dragonblood. What's next? WPA3 is an improvement over WPA2 Wi-Fi encryption protocol, however, as we predicted, it still doesn't provide protection from the six known Wi-Fi threat categories. It's highly likely that we'll see more WPA3 vulnerabilities announced within the near future. To help reduce Wi-Fi vulnerabilities, we're asking all of you to hitch the Trusted Wireless Environment movement and advocate for a worldwide security standard for Wi-Fi.


NEW QUESTION # 31
Steve, a scientist who works in a governmental security agency, developed a technological solution to identify people based on walking patterns and implemented this approach to a physical control access.
A camera captures people walking and identifies the individuals using Steve's approach.
After that, people must approximate their RFID badges. Both the identifications are required to open the door. In this case, we can say:

  • A. Biological motion cannot be used to identify people
  • B. The solution will have a high level of false positives
  • C. The solution implements the two authentication factors: physical object and physical characteristic
  • D. Although the approach has two phases, it actually implements just one authentication factor

Answer: C


NEW QUESTION # 32
Allen, a professional pen tester, was hired by XpertTech Solutions to perform an attack simulation on the organization's network resources. To perform the attack, he took advantage of the NetBIOS API and targeted the NetBIOS service. By enumerating NetBIOS, he found that port 139 was open and could see the resources that could be accessed or viewed on a remote system. He came across many NetBIOS codes during enumeration.
Identify the NetBIOS code used for obtaining the messenger service running for the logged-in user?

  • A. <20>
  • B. <00>
  • C. <03>
  • D. <1B>

Answer: C


NEW QUESTION # 33
Bill is a network administrator. He wants to eliminate unencrypted traffic inside his company's network. He decides to setup a SPAN port and capture all traffic to the datacenter. He immediately discovers unencrypted traffic in port UDP 161. what protocol is this port using and how can he secure that traffic?

  • A. RPC and the best practice is to disable RPC completely
  • B. it is not necessary to perform any actions, as SNMP is not carrying important information.
  • C. SNMP and he should change it to SNMP V3
  • D. SNMP and he should change it to SNMP v2, which is encrypted

Answer: C

Explanation:
We have various articles already in our documentation for setting up SNMPv2 trap handling in Opsview, but SNMPv3 traps are a whole new ballgame. They can be quite confusing and complicated to set up the first time you go through the process, but when you understand what is going on, everything should make more sense.
SNMP has gone through several revisions to improve performance and security (version 1, 2c and 3). By default, it is a UDP port based protocol where communication is based on a 'fire and forget' methodology in which network packets are sent to another device, but there is no check for receipt of that packet (versus TCP port when a network packet must be acknowledged by the other end of the communication link).
There are two modes of operation with SNMP - get requests (or polling) where one device requests information from an SNMP enabled device on a regular basis (normally using UDP port 161), and traps where the SNMP enabled device sends a message to another device when an event occurs (normally using UDP port 162). The latter includes instances such as someone logging on, the device powering up or down, or a wide variety of other problems that would need this type of investigation.
This blog covers SNMPv3 traps, as polling and version 2c traps are covered elsewhere in our documentation.
SNMP traps
Since SNMP is primarily a UDP port based system, traps may be 'lost' when sending between devices; the sending device does not wait to see if the receiver got the trap. This means if the configuration on the sending device is wrong (using the wrong receiver IP address or port) or the receiver isn't listening for traps or rejecting them out of hand due to misconfiguration, the sender will never know.
The SNMP v2c specification introduced the idea of splitting traps into two types; the original 'hope it gets there' trap and the newer 'INFORM' traps. Upon receipt of an INFORM, the receiver must send an acknowledgement back. If the sender doesn't get the acknowledgement back, then it knows there is an existing problem and can log it for sysadmins to find when they interrogate the device.


NEW QUESTION # 34
What is the common name for a vulnerability disclosure program opened by companies In platforms such as HackerOne?

  • A. Ethical hacking program
  • B. Bug bounty program
  • C. White-hat hacking program
  • D. Vulnerability hunting program

Answer: B

Explanation:
Bug bounty programs allow independent security researchers to report bugs to an companies and receive rewards or compensation. These bugs area unit sometimes security exploits and vulnerabilities, although they will additionally embody method problems, hardware flaws, and so on.
The reports area unit usually created through a program travel by associate degree freelance third party (like Bugcrowd or HackerOne). The companies can got wind of (and run) a program curated to the organization's wants.
Programs is also non-public (invite-only) wherever reports area unit unbroken confidential to the organization or public (where anyone will sign in and join). they will happen over a collection timeframe or with without stopping date (though the second possibility is a lot of common).
Who uses bug bounty programs?
Many major organizations use bug bounties as an area of their security program, together with AOL, Android, Apple, Digital Ocean, and goldman Sachs. you'll read an inventory of all the programs offered by major bug bounty suppliers, Bugcrowd and HackerOne, at these links.
Why do corporations use bug bounty programs?
Bug bounty programs provide corporations the flexibility to harness an outsized cluster of hackers so as to seek out bugs in their code.
This gives them access to a bigger variety of hackers or testers than they'd be able to access on a one-on-one basis. It {can also|also will|can even|may also|may} increase the probabilities that bugs area unit found and reported to them before malicious hackers can exploit them.
It may also be an honest publicity alternative for a firm. As bug bounties became a lot of common, having a bug bounty program will signal to the general public and even regulators that a corporation incorporates a mature security program.
This trend is likely to continue, as some have began to see bug bounty programs as an business normal that all companies ought to invest in.
Why do researchers and hackers participate in bug bounty programs?
Finding and news bugs via a bug bounty program may end up in each money bonuses and recognition. In some cases, it will be a good thanks to show real-world expertise once you are looking for employment, or will even facilitate introduce you to parents on the protection team within an companies.
This can be full time income for a few of us, income to supplement employment, or the way to point out off your skills and find a full time job.
It may also be fun! it is a nice (legal) probability to check out your skills against huge companies and government agencies.
What area unit the disadvantages of a bug bounty program for independent researchers and hackers?
A lot of hackers participate in these varieties of programs, and it will be tough to form a major quantity of cash on the platform.
In order to say the reward, the hacker has to be the primary person to submit the bug to the program. meaning that in apply, you may pay weeks searching for a bug to use, solely to be the person to report it and build no cash.
Roughly ninety seven of participants on major bug bounty platforms haven't sold-out a bug.
In fact, a 2019 report from HackerOne confirmed that out of quite three hundred,000 registered users, solely around two.5% received a bounty in their time on the platform.
Essentially, most hackers are not creating a lot of cash on these platforms, and really few square measure creating enough to switch a full time wage (plus they do not have advantages like vacation days, insurance, and retirement planning).
What square measure the disadvantages of bug bounty programs for organizations?
These programs square measure solely helpful if the program ends up in the companies realizeing issues that they weren't able to find themselves (and if they'll fix those problems)!
If the companies is not mature enough to be able to quickly rectify known problems, a bug bounty program is not the right alternative for his or her companies.
Also, any bug bounty program is probably going to draw in an outsized range of submissions, several of which can not be high-quality submissions. a corporation must be ready to cope with the exaggerated volume of alerts, and also the risk of a coffee signal to noise magnitude relation (essentially that it's probably that they're going to receive quite few unhelpful reports for each useful report).
Additionally, if the program does not attract enough participants (or participants with the incorrect talent set, and so participants are not able to establish any bugs), the program is not useful for the companies.
The overwhelming majority of bug bounty participants consider web site vulnerabilities (72%, per HackerOn), whereas solely a number of (3.5%) value more highly to seek for package vulnerabilities.
This is probably because of the actual fact that hacking in operation systems (like network hardware and memory) needs a big quantity of extremely specialised experience. this implies that firms may even see vital come on investment for bug bounties on websites, and not for alternative applications, notably those that need specialised experience.
This conjointly implies that organizations which require to look at AN application or web site among a selected time-frame may not need to rely on a bug bounty as there is no guarantee of once or if they receive reports.
Finally, it are often probably risky to permit freelance researchers to try to penetrate your network. this could end in public speech act of bugs, inflicting name harm within the limelight (which could end in individuals not eager to purchase the organizations' product or service), or speech act of bugs to additional malicious third parties, United Nations agency may use this data to focus on the organization.


NEW QUESTION # 35
If a tester is attempting to ping a target that exists but receives no response or a response that states the destination is unreachable, ICMP may be disabled and the network may be using TCP. Which other option could the tester use to get a response from a host using TCP?

  • A. Hping
  • B. Broadcast ping
  • C. Traceroute
  • D. TCP ping

Answer: A

Explanation:
https://tools.kali.org/information-gathering/hping3


NEW QUESTION # 36
A company's Web development team has become aware of a certain type of security vulnerability in their Web software. To mitigate the possibility of this vulnerability being exploited, the team wants to modify the software requirements to disallow users from entering HTML as input into their Web application.
What kind of Web application vulnerability likely exists in their software?

  • A. SQL injection vulnerability
  • B. Web site defacement vulnerability
  • C. Cross-site scripting vulnerability
  • D. Gross-site Request Forgery vulnerability

Answer: C


NEW QUESTION # 37
What piece of hardware on a computer's motherboard generates encryption keys and only releases a part of the key so that decrypting a disk on a new piece of hardware is not possible?

  • A. GPU
  • B. UEFI
  • C. TPM
  • D. CPU

Answer: C


NEW QUESTION # 38
Sam, a web developer, was instructed to incorporate a hybrid encryption software program into a web application to secure email messages. Sam used an encryption software, which is a free implementation of the OpenPGP standard that uses both symmetric-key cryptography and asymmetric-key cryptography for improved speed and secure key exchange. What is the encryption software employed by Sam for securing the email messages?

  • A. S/MIME
  • B. PGP
  • C. GPG
  • D. SMTP

Answer: B


NEW QUESTION # 39
Ralph, a professional hacker, targeted Jane, who had recently bought new systems for her company. After a few days, Ralph contacted Jane while masquerading as a legitimate customer support executive, informing that her systems need to be serviced for proper functioning and that customer support will send a computer technician. Jane promptly replied positively. Ralph entered Jane's company using this opportunity and gathered sensitive information by scanning terminals for passwords, searching for important documents in desks, and rummaging bins. What is the type of attack technique Ralph used on jane?

  • A. impersonation
  • B. Dumpster diving
  • C. Eavesdropping
  • D. Shoulder surfing

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 40
These hackers have limited or no training and know how to use only basic techniques or tools.
What kind of hackers are we talking about?

  • A. White-Hat Hackers
  • B. Black-Hat Hackers A
  • C. Script Kiddies
  • D. Gray-Hat Hacker

Answer: C

Explanation:
Script Kiddies: These hackers have limited or no training and know how to use only basictechniques or tools. Even then they may not understand any or all of what they are doing.


NEW QUESTION # 41
The network team has well-established procedures to follow for creating new rules on the firewall. This includes having approval from a manager prior to implementing any new rules. While reviewing the firewall configuration, you notice a recently implemented rule but cannot locate manager approval for it. What would be a good step to have in the procedures for a situation like this?

  • A. Have the network team document the reason why the rule was implemented without prior manager approval.
  • B. Immediately roll back the firewall rule until a manager can approve it
  • C. Monitor all traffic using the firewall rule until a manager can approve it.
  • D. Do not roll back the firewall rule as the business may be relying upon it, but try to get manager approval as soon as possible.

Answer: B


NEW QUESTION # 42
......

Revolutionary Guide To Exam EC-COUNCIL Dumps: https://exams4sure.pass4sures.top/CEH-v11/312-50v11-testking-braindumps.html